On 18 March 2015 Private Eye published this short article:

This is very interesting. Below is an article they had written in 2013 but decided not to publish at the eleventh hour – they still haven’t told me the reason. In the article above it would appear they are stating the reason is what the bank told them at the time, that the agreements allowed the bank to add the charges. Not true. I told the Eye about the OFT order forbidding the adding of the charges. It seems the Eye has found some confidence now that an MP has asked questions in Parliament, direct evidence from a whistleblower not being sufficient for them. Here’s the original ariticle: